Retour à la liste
Nutrition et santé Fact-check publié le 13/05/2024

People Injured by COVID Vaccines Are Being ‘Ignored’

Le post original

Headline: New York Times Investigation Finds People Injured by COVID Vaccines Are Being ‘Ignored’ Shame on the mining industries captains, who went along with the bullying and coercion and defying their own health and safety values: DO NO HARM. Never again. ⭐️ New York Times u-turns on vaccine injuries as “misinformation” and “conspiracy theory” “After years of reporting on news about vaccine injuries as “misinformation” and “conspiracy theory,” The New York Times today reported that “thousands” may have been injured by the COVID-19 vaccines — but ran accompanying articles declaring the shots safe and life-saving. ⭐️ NY Times yearlong investigation The New York Times today reported that COVID-19 vaccine injuries exist and that vaccine-injured people have been ignored. The findings resulted from a yearlong investigation into the issue, the paper said. After years of labeling commentary, articles and even search engine queries about vaccine injuries as misinformation, conspiracy theory, and “far-right,” lambasting social media companies for allowing vaccine injury stories on their platforms and even ridiculing a family whose children died from the vaccine, the Times conceded that “thousands” may have been injured by the COVID-19 vaccines. ⭐️ Thousands Believe Covid Vaccines Harmed Them. Is Anyone Listening? Under the headline, “Thousands Believe Covid Vaccines Harmed Them. Is Anyone Listening?” Times reporter Apoorva Mandavilli reported that the injuries aren’t unexpected because “all vaccines have at least occasional side effects.” The article featured several vaccine-injured people, reporting on their medical issues and the “disbelief and ambivalence” they encountered from doctors and the media. The Times also published two commentaries related to the investigative feature. One, by Mandavilli, summarized key takeaways from the investigation and the other, by David Leonhardt for “The Morning Newsletter,” reassured readers about the safety of the vaccines and downplayed the injuries. Data scientist and immunology researcher Jessica Rose, Ph.D. said she has been unable to locate any case or published study “where there are no conflicts of interest involved,” supporting the claim that COVID-19 injectable products saved lives. All-cause mortality researcher Denis Rancourt, Ph.D. said “The claims that vaccines saved lives are vast and groundless exaggerations, modeling fantasies,” as his research has shown. Rose also said the Times’ admission of harms associated with the COVID-19 injectable products after years of mandated rollouts, “is a stark indication of just how bad the problem of injection injuries really is in the context of these products, in my opinion.” “Anyone who has looked at a pharmacovigilance database can see immediately that there is disproportionate reporting of hospitalizations, serious illness and death, when comparing the COVID-19 products with all vaccines combined, going back 30 years (in the case of VAERS).” Quote

Le fact-check

The conclusions drawn here are WRONG and biased. The article discussed in the post is a New York Time's article (https://tinyurl.com/6h9hb2sn). But an article from the Defender is shared with interpretations of the NYT article. 1) It is NOT said in the NYT article that ‟Covid-19 vaccine injuries exist”, but that most so-called injuries have not been proved to have any link with the vaccines. Actually, it's in the title of the article: "thousands BELIEVE" - a belief is not a scientific proof. The rare side effects that have been proved are the same as for any other vaccines (for instance : the Guillain-Barré syndrom). => For example, the NYT reports a statement by the FDA regarding potential cases of tinnitus : “at this time, the available evidence does not suggest a causal association with the Covid-19 vaccines.” 2) As for any other vaccine, there can be some side effects. Medicine works with a ‟risk/benefit” ratio: there is always some risk in taking a drug or a vaccine, but it is recommended when the risk of not doing it is higher. 3) What are the sources regarding the ‟family whose children died from the vaccine”? This sounds like a typical emotional statement which stops people from thinking. 4) Regarding Jessica Rose, quoted as a reliable reference: she has been accused of misusing VAERS data to claim vaccines are not safe - see here: https://tinyurl.com/5yxmtx8h 5) « All-cause mortality researcher Denis Rancourt, Ph.D. said “The claims that vaccines saved lives are vast and groundless exaggerations, modeling fantasies,” as his research has shown. » : one study does not have much value, especially when done by someone who comes from completely another field (physics https://tinyurl.com/fjhvknuv), and when there are many other studies with a much higher proof level that show the opposite. => see for instance this metanalysis study "Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: a literature review and meta-analysis": https://tinyurl.com/4mfvhhar 6) About the post's last paragraph: This is not based on any study, but is rather just an opinion. In science, you cannot establish causalities by merely looking at numbers, you need to prove that these events are related one to another. Also, the database that is mentioned, VAERS, is particularly not a reliable source since anyone can report there to have symptoms without proofs (https://tinyurl.com/mpsspeuz).

Historique

2 étapes
9 mars 2025 • 18:30

Post Reçu

13 mai 2024 • 08:45

Publication

The conclusions drawn here are WRONG and biased. The article discussed in the post is a New York Time's article (https://tinyurl.com/6h9hb2sn). But an article from the Defender is shared with interpretations of the NYT article. 1) It is NOT said in the NYT article that ‟Covid-19 vaccine injuries exist”, but that most so-called injuries have not been proved to have any link with the vaccines. Actually, it's in the title of the article: "thousands BELIEVE" - a belief is not a scientific proof. The rare side effects that have been proved are the same as for any other vaccines (for instance : the Guillain-Barré syndrom). => For example, the NYT reports a statement by the FDA regarding potential cases of tinnitus : “at this time, the available evidence does not suggest a causal association with the Covid-19 vaccines.” 2) As for any other vaccine, there can be some side effects. Medicine works with a ‟risk/benefit” ratio: there is always some risk in taking a drug or a vaccine, but it is recommended when the risk of not doing it is higher. 3) What are the sources regarding the ‟family whose children died from the vaccine”? This sounds like a typical emotional statement which stops people from thinking. 4) Regarding Jessica Rose, quoted as a reliable reference: she has been accused of misusing VAERS data to claim vaccines are not safe - see here: https://tinyurl.com/5yxmtx8h 5) « All-cause mortality researcher Denis Rancourt, Ph.D. said “The claims that vaccines saved lives are vast and groundless exaggerations, modeling fantasies,” as his research has shown. » : one study does not have much value, especially when done by someone who comes from completely another field (physics https://tinyurl.com/fjhvknuv), and when there are many other studies with a much higher proof level that show the opposite. => see for instance this metanalysis study "Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: a literature review and meta-analysis": https://tinyurl.com/4mfvhhar 6) About the post's last paragraph: This is not based on any study, but is rather just an opinion. In science, you cannot establish causalities by merely looking at numbers, you need to prove that these events are related one to another. Also, the database that is mentioned, VAERS, is particularly not a reliable source since anyone can report there to have symptoms without proofs (https://tinyurl.com/mpsspeuz).

Vous avez une question, une remarque ou une suggestion ? Contactez-nous, nous vous répondrons au plus vite !

Nous contacter
Posez votre question à VeraVera