Économie et société Fact-check publié le

Les capacités cognitives de la GenZ déclinent

⚠️ À nuancer

Le post

Recent studies indicate that young people, particularly Generation Z, are experiencing measurable declines in key cognitive abilities compared to previous generations, reversing the long-standing Flynn effect where IQ scores rose steadily by about three points per decade due to better nutrition, education, and health. Analyses of large datasets from the US, Europe, and over 80 countries show Gen Z scoring 2-4 points lower on standardized tests of IQ, verbal reasoning, numerical skills, memory, attention, and problem-solving than Millennials at similar ages. Declines appear most pronounced in fluid intelligence and among 18-22-year-olds, with PISA results and other assessments confirming weaker reading comprehension, sustained focus, and executive function despite more years of schooling. Neuroscientist Jared Cooney Horvath highlighted this shift around 2010, linking it to heavy screen time, digital education tools like tablets replacing deep reading and handwriting, short-form content fragmenting attention, and reduced opportunities for focused, effortful thinking. Other factors include potential changes in youth culture, sleep disruption, and environmental influences, though debates persist on methodology, with some research showing heterogeneity by age or ability level rather than uniform drops. While not all studies agree—certain cohorts display gains in processing speed—the pattern of reversal in traditional cognitive metrics raises concerns about long-term impacts on innovation, workforce readiness, and societal problem-solving capacity. Whether fully irreversible depends on interventions like limiting passive screen use, promoting rigorous analog learning, exercise, and sleep; early evidence suggests plasticity remains, but prolonged habits may entrench deficits if unaddressed. This trend signals a need for balanced technology integration to safeguard developing brains. By Michio Kaku
Image du post LinkedIn vérifié

Le fact-check

A real warning , but a biased narrative. ✅ Data does show a slowdown or even a reversal of the Flynn effect in several countries, such as Norway, where a study found that IQ scores stopped rising and then declined slightly from one generation to the next. https://urls.fr/qpcBFH At the global level, an analysis covering more than 300,000 people across 72 countries finds the same trend. The 2022 PISA results also confirm a drop in performance in mathematics and reading comprehension in many countries, including France, although early primary grades (CP) show a different trend. https://urls.fr/-EEmIh; https://urls.fr/3uz9VC However, recent fact-checks show that these declines are uneven, and that Jared Cooney Horvath’s claims have been oversimplified and correlation is not causation. https://urls.fr/x5ddZn; https://urls.fr/WJqDZ7; As for screens, expert reviews conclude that their effects are modest and highly context-dependent, far from the narrative that “smartphones are making Gen Z stupid”: https://urls.fr/PZ8Q1O; https://urls.fr/ER7xLl In short, there are genuine warning signals in some cognitive and educational indicators for Gen Z, but the way the story is told is biased, not an established fact.

Historique

6 étapes
1 mai 2026 • 09:22

Post Reçu

13 mai 2026 • 18:45

En traitement

14 mai 2026 • 05:56

Fact-check terminé

15 mai 2026 • 17:25

Fact-check relu

15 mai 2026 • 19:29

Fact-check relu

15 mai 2026 • 20:48

Publication

A real warning , but a biased narrative. ✅ Data does show a slowdown or even a reversal of the Flynn effect in several countries, such as Norway, where a study found that IQ scores stopped rising and then declined slightly from one generation to the next. https://urls.fr/qpcBFH At the global level, an analysis covering more than 300,000 people across 72 countries finds the same trend. The 2022 PISA results also confirm a drop in performance in mathematics and reading comprehension in many countries, including France, although early primary grades (CP) show a different trend. https://urls.fr/-EEmIh; https://urls.fr/3uz9VC However, recent fact-checks show that these declines are uneven, and that Jared Cooney Horvath’s claims have been oversimplified and correlation is not causation. https://urls.fr/x5ddZn; https://urls.fr/WJqDZ7; As for screens, expert reviews conclude that their effects are modest and highly context-dependent, far from the narrative that “smartphones are making Gen Z stupid”: https://urls.fr/PZ8Q1O; https://urls.fr/ER7xLl In short, there are genuine warning signals in some cognitive and educational indicators for Gen Z, but the way the story is told is biased, not an established fact.

Vous avez une question, une remarque ou une suggestion ? Contactez-nous, nous vous répondrons au plus vite !

Nous contacter
Posez votre question à VeraVera