The Lancet censored a ground breaking covid-19 study

The article (https://lc.cx/wF3oUN) has never been retracted by The Lancet because it was never published! The authors identified 678 studies, narrowing it down to 44 papers containing 326 autopsy cases. The statement that “All autopsy studies that include COVID-19 vaccines as a possible cause of death were included” implies that studies which excluded COVID-19 vaccines as a cause were omitted. The analysis only considers deaths that occurred shortly after vaccination, mistakenly equating correlation with causation. In fact, 73.9% of the deaths claimed to be “significantly linked to the vaccine” are likely just chronologically related. Dr. Peter McCullough, the last author, has a controversial reputation (https://lc.cx/H-5DDj). He has previously written COVID-19-related papers that were rejected (https://lc.cx/sR3EwX). A more detailed debunking of this article can be found here: https://lc.cx/oVd_RK As a side note, the article was recently published in another journal (https://lc.cx/dJE_FY), which focuses on the application of medicine and science in the administration of justice. This does not seem particularly relevant to the subject at hand.